In contrast, Nike (which topped the 2013 list), another established company, makes its way onto the list again this year because it has expanded to another field with an app that other companies can use to determine the environmental footprint of their materials. Because Nike is a manufacturer themselves, the app is still in line with the original purpose of their business. Fast quotes Hannah Jones from Nike on the reasoning for developing the app: "the app evolved out of Nike's push to eliminate the use of hazardous chemicals in the creation of its products by 2020." Nike has embraced The Experimenter persona in their company, especially if one looks back at the article from when they topped the list in 2013. In making an app for the industry, and not just for themselves, Nike has expanded into both the environmental sector and the software development sectors.
While the persona of The Experimenter is common on the list, The Cross-Pollinator is not so obvious. Google, now in their 16th year, was number one on the list this year. Despite the fact that Google has spread well beyond a search engine, many would still define it as such when asked. According to Kelley, The Cross-Pollinator can bring in ideas from areas outside of the company. Using the technologies that they used to create their search engine, Google has created several products across several disciplines. This makes me believe that the persona of the Cross-Pollinator is well-respected by the company.
While the persona of The Experimenter is common on the list, The Cross-Pollinator is not so obvious. Google, now in their 16th year, was number one on the list this year. Despite the fact that Google has spread well beyond a search engine, many would still define it as such when asked. According to Kelley, The Cross-Pollinator can bring in ideas from areas outside of the company. Using the technologies that they used to create their search engine, Google has created several products across several disciplines. This makes me believe that the persona of the Cross-Pollinator is well-respected by the company.
The Ten Faces of Innovation also reminded me of several moments on ABC's Shark Tank, in which six "sharks" invest in entrepreneurs. During the first season, Tiffany Krumins came on the show with an idea for a medicine-dispensing product for kids which she realized in a clay prototype. The creator came up with the idea when faced with the challenge of getting a child that she babysat to take medicine. By creating the prototype, she was able to communicate to "the sharks" what her idea was, and she was able to get an investment. Krumins is what Kelley would call The Experimenter. Kelley explains how important the prototype is--no matter how crude. Unfortunately, on Shark Tank these days, the sharks usually snub prototypes, favoring instead companies that have proof of their concept with sales.
I've never watched Shark Tank, but your description here has me interested. The example of prototyping is a great match with the anecdotes Tom Kelley included in his book. I wanted to see more details about the clay prototype for dispensing medicine, but the link only goes to blogger.com. If you still have the link around, please share! (My 7-year-old niece has a daily medication and I'm sure she would LOVE this concept! I am guessing that it makes it feel more like a game, or a candy reward, for the kids?)
ReplyDeleteWhoops! Thanks for letting me know. Here's the link to the Shark Tank pitch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8F7osrO31A.
DeleteThe product has the dual function of hiding the medicine dropper and making medicine-taking more fun. It's cool to see the difference between the prototype and the final product (at about 5:50 in the video).